<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of the day</title>
	<link>http://digeratinc.com/2006/03/13/of-the-day/</link>
	<description>ressources for the impatient digerati - links, thoughts, ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://digeratinc.com/2006/03/13/of-the-day/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Alex</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://digeratinc.com/2006/03/13/of-the-day/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A couple of seconds into the article linked above, I just remembered: I already saw the article on the Next-Net about a week ago, and all I could think of was: hell, how much did those guys pay for PR?

I mean.. I've heard of half of the sites there, and I guess they are in the article to make it seem more legitimate; but as for the rest... they may be good but certainly don't diserve their place as "the next 25".

As for reality check, I also suggest  Russel Beatie's WTF 2.0 (link in the Page : # Various articles for February-March 2006) along with the above article on 30 boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of seconds into the article linked above, I just remembered: I already saw the article on the Next-Net about a week ago, and all I could think of was: hell, how much did those guys pay for PR?</p>
<p>I mean.. I&#8217;ve heard of half of the sites there, and I guess they are in the article to make it seem more legitimate; but as for the rest&#8230; they may be good but certainly don&#8217;t diserve their place as &#8220;the next 25&#8243;.</p>
<p>As for reality check, I also suggest  Russel Beatie&#8217;s WTF 2.0 (link in the Page : # Various articles for February-March 2006) along with the above article on 30 boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
